To be clear, I would definitely not run a water loop that hot, nor do I consider that okay for an AIO, but he's pretty clear on that being "safe" for a "lasting unit" in the interview. Still, he confirms what I said in the previous post though: "We know 60☌ is good, we've done extensive testing to ensure that 60☌ is what will create a lasting unit." So from what they're saying, passing 60☌ is bad, but running at 60☌ should be no problem at all. Makes me wonder what changes around that level - whether it passes some threshold for permeation, whether that's where you start seeing the pump's "ambient" temperature (casing, block) run too high for it to be able to keep itself cool.
Also, you're neglecting the fact that the Fury X has a much thicker radiator than both of those pictured cards - and likely a much more powerful fan (as EVGA's fans have been known to perform rather poorly on radiators, and Gentle Typhoons are still pretty high up performance charts. In the end, the thermal difference between an AIO-cooled 1080 Ti and a Fury X is quite small, in the low tens of watts. And yes, some of that heat would be exhausted by the VRM fan, but a well configured VRM is >90% efficient, so the majority of power will be going through the AIO.
#Amd radeon 6900 xt manual#
Manual OC's would push them above 300W relatively easily - and those cards were widely known to be easy to OC. There are shockingly few reviews from this era with GPU power measurements, but 1080 Tis exceeding 250W and nearing 300W from the factory was relatively common, as seen in TPU's reviews ( 1, 2, 3). You're also right that the off-the-shelf AIOs do lower the thermal input to the loop, though at least some of those integrate the VRAM into the loop in various ways (either through enlarged cold plates or some kind of intermediate VRAM plate that makes contact with the cold plate), so that calculation isn't quite as cut-and-dried - particularly when these models were very directly geared towards overclocking. It definitely had pump whine issues as you brought up - that was widely reported even in the initial reviews - but that is entirely unrelated to thermally induced pump failure. ValantarYep, and so far we've yet to see any conclusive proof that the Fury X had widespread pump failure issues (nor any evidence to indicate that if it had such an issue, it was down to thermals and not something like a poorly designed pump).
System integrators are a critical part of the gaming ecosystem and offering this this model through their channels helps ensure that as many of these products as possible get into gamers hands. AMD will be making a limited number of Radeon RX 6900 XT liquid cooled reference design graphics cards available to select system integrators. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT LC features an increased boost clock speed of 2435 MHz from the 2250 MHz on the RX 6900 XT along with a memory speed boost from 16 Gbps to 18 Gbps. The card appears to be receiving a limited release with PowerColor's model (16GBD6-MW2DHC) now available to purchase from German retailer Mindfactory for 1749 EUR. These reference design cards were not expected to be available in the DIY market but listings for the cards appeared on some Indian retailers after the announcement. AMD first announced the Radeon RX 6900 XT LC featuring a pre-binned Navi 21 XTXH GPU in June with the product only available to select system integrators and OEMs.
0 kommentar(er)
